Ex Parte MIELKE et al - Page 5




          Appeal No. 2002-2295                                                        
          Application 08/988,457                                                      


          particular radio base station currently communicating with each             
          of the plurality of mobile units;                                           
               receiving a request to transfer data to a selected group of            
          the plurality of mobile units; and                                          
               transferring data from the central station to the selected             
          group of mobile units using the radio base stations identified by           
          the registration information stored in the registration database            
          for each mobile unit in the selected group, wherein the data                
          transferred to the selected group of mobile units includes                  
          application software invoked by at least one of the mobile units.           
                                   References                                         
               The references relied on by the Examiner are as follows:               
               Grube et al. (Grube)          5,553,314      Sept. 3, 1996             
               LaPorta et al. (LaPorta)      6,014,429      Jan. 11, 2000             
                                             (filing date Aug. 12, 1996)              
                              Rejection at Issue                                      
               Claims 1 through 3, 5, 7, 8, 11 through 14, 16, 17 and 20              
          stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over             
          LaPorta in view of Grube.                                                   
               Rather than repeat the arguments of Appellants or the                  
          Examiner, we make reference to the briefs1 and the answer for the           
          respective details thereof.                                                 



               1 Appellants filed an appeal brief on January 30, 2002.                
          Appellants filed a reply brief on June 24, 2002.  The Examiner              
          mailed an office communication on August 2, 2002, stating that              
          the reply brief has been considered and entered.                            
                                          5                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007