Ex Parte MIMLITCH et al - Page 3




          Appeal No. 2002-2341                                                        
          Application 09/466,277                                                      


          Claim 51 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being                  
          anticipated by Marks.                                                       


          Claims 33 and 34 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as                 
          being unpatentable over Marks in view of Straccia.                          


          Claim 35 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being                  
          unpatentable over Marks in view of DeWilde.                                 


          Claims 35 and 36 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as                 
          being unpatentable over Marks in view of Watanabe.                          


          Claims 52, 44 and 46 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)                
          as being unpatentable over Marks in view of Howrilka and                    
          Watanabe.                                                                   


          Claims 42 and 43 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as                 
          being unpatentable over Marks in view of Howrilka and Watanabe as           
          applied to claim 52 above, and further in view of Straccia.                 





                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007