Appeal No. 2002-2341
Application 09/466,277
the examiner may wish to consider a rejection of claim 51 under
35 U.S.C. § 103(a) based on the collective teachings of Marks and
Howrilka.
3) The examiner should also consider any appropriate prior
art rejections of dependent claims 33 through 36.
REVERSED AND REMANDED
CHARLES E. FRANKFORT )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JOHN P. McQUADE )
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)
) INTERFERENCES
)
JEFFREY V. NASE )
Administrative Patent Judge )
CEF:pgg
13
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007