The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 33
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DANIEL SEINSEVIN
____________
Appeal No. 2003-0021
Application No. 08/983,383
____________
HEARD: MAY 20, 2003
____________
Before COHEN, FRANKFORT, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
COHEN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 15, 16,
and 19 through 37. These claims constitute all of the claims
remaining in the application.
Appellant’s invention pertains to a method of growing one
row of vines so as to avoid frost damage and to promote good
fruiting, and to a method of facilitating grape ripening on a row
of vines after the vines have been grown to the beginning of
ripening without being covered by film. A basic understanding of
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007