The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 21
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex Parte ROBERT W. CALLAHAN, RON W. CALL,
KEN J. HARLESON and TA-HUA YU
_______________
Appeal No. 2003-0029
Application 09/385,933
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before, KIMLIN, KRATZ and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.
JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
Decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
Applicants appeal the decision of the Primary Examiner finally rejecting claims
1 to 15.1, 2 We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 134.
1 In rendering our decision, we have considered Appellants’ arguments presented in the
Substitute Brief, filed January 10, 2002.
2 According to Appellants, claims 16-20 have been withdrawn from consideration. (Brief,
p. 2).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007