Appeal No. 2003-0047
Application No. 09/350,335
not provided additional evidence to overcome the deficiencies of
Kondo as discussed above with respect to the rejection of claims
2, 5, 9, 10 and 13-15, and therefore, has failed to establish a
prima facie case of obviousness. Accordingly, we do not sustain
the 35 U.S.C. § 103 rejection of claim 12 over Kondo nor of
claims 16 and 17 over Kondo and the admitted prior art.
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007