Appeal No. 2003-0059 Application 09/238,553 whereby said label can be first separate from said backing web and then applied to articles, and thereafter removed from said articles leaving said adhesive layer and said third coating layer on said articles. THE REFERENCES Eckberg et al. (Eckberg) 5,369,205 Nov. 29, 1994 Freedman (Freedman ‘165) 5,914,165 Jun. 22, 1999 (filed Jul. 29, 1996) THE REJECTION Claims 1-12 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Freedman ‘165 in view of Eckberg. OPINION We reverse the aforementioned rejection. Freedman ‘165 discloses a peelable label comprising, in order, an optional release liner (the appellant’s backing web), a pressure sensitive adhesive (14), a first polymeric layer (11) (preferably polyethylene) and a second polymeric layer (12) (preferably polypropylene) which is dissimilar to the first polymeric layer (col. 3, lines 1-3, 13-14, 41-42, 47-48 and 53- 54). “The films [layers 11 and 12] adhere to each other to a sufficiently high degree to withstand the maximum separation forces imposed as the labels are processed. However, the films adhere to each other to a sufficiently low degree to allow them to cleanly and readily separate from each other under the 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007