Ex Parte SPINA - Page 6




           Appeal No. 2003-0059                                                                     
           Application 09/238,553                                                                   


           Eckberg teaches that the epoxysilicone polymer has release                               
           properties (col. 1, lines 38-42).  Freedman ‘165, however,                               
           requires that the first and second polymer layers have a                                 
           sufficiently high degree of adherence to each other to withstand                         
           the maximum separation forces imposed as the labels are processed                        
           (col. 2, lines 26-29).  The disclosed polymers for obtaining that                        
           adherence are polyolefins (col. 3, lines 13-44).  The UV curable                         
           material is applied to only a portion or edge of the second layer                        
           to facilitate peeling (col. 5, lines 27-34).  The examiner has                           
           not established that a second layer made of epoxysilicone polymer                        
           would provide the required degree of adherence to the first                              
           polymer layer.                                                                           
                 Also, Freedman ‘165 discloses that the UV curable material,                        
           which is applied to the second layer, shrinks upon exposure to                           
           UV radiation, thereby pulling up the edge of the label and                               
           breaking the bond between the first and second polymer layers                            
           (col. 5, lines 27-34).  The appellant’s independent claims                               
           require that the silicone layer and the varnish layer are                                
           separable from each other when labels containing these layers are                        
           pulled from a surface.  Thus, to establish a prima facie case of                         
           obviousness of the appellant’s claimed invention over                                    
           Freedman ‘165 and Eckberg, the examiner has the burden of                                

                                                 6                                                  





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007