Ex Parte Stanczak - Page 1




                               The opinion in support of the decision entered today was not written                     
                                    for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                          

                                                                                              Paper No. 18              


                               UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                
                                                     ____________                                                       
                                    BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                  
                                                AND INTERFERENCES                                                       
                                                     ____________                                                       
                                           Ex parte EDMUND A. STANCZAK                                                  
                                                     ____________                                                       
                                                 Appeal No.  2003-0083                                                  
                                               Application No. 09/691,532                                               
                                                     ____________                                                       
                                                       ON BRIEF                                                         
                                                     ____________                                                       
              Before COHEN, STAAB, and McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                           
              STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                       


                                                DECISION ON APPEAL                                                      
                     This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1, 7-9,              
              15 and 16.  Claims 3-6, 11-14, 17 and 18, the only other claims currently pending in the                  
              application, have been allowed.                                                                           
                     Appellant’s invention pertains to a debris extractor for use with an axle wheel end.               
              As explained on pages 1-2 of appellant’s specification, ferrous metallic debris builds up in              
              lubricant in the axle wheel end cavity during vehicle operation.  Appellant’s invention                   
              involves providing a magnet in the axle wheel to attract this ferrous metallic debris.  Thus,             






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007