The opinion in support of the decision entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 18 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte EDMUND A. STANCZAK ____________ Appeal No. 2003-0083 Application No. 09/691,532 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before COHEN, STAAB, and McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judges. STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1, 7-9, 15 and 16. Claims 3-6, 11-14, 17 and 18, the only other claims currently pending in the application, have been allowed. Appellant’s invention pertains to a debris extractor for use with an axle wheel end. As explained on pages 1-2 of appellant’s specification, ferrous metallic debris builds up in lubricant in the axle wheel end cavity during vehicle operation. Appellant’s invention involves providing a magnet in the axle wheel to attract this ferrous metallic debris. Thus,Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007