Ex Parte Stanczak - Page 5




              Appeal No. 2003-0083                                                                      5               
              Application No. 09/691,532                                                                                


                     Ehrlich pertains to an apparatus for mounting a wheel on a vehicle including a                     
              hollow, non-rotatable axle 22, a wheel hub 40 having a hollow spindle 30, and a valve or                  
              venting structure 68 positioned within the spindle.  The valve is a soft, flexible membrane               
              or diaphragm that is made of suitable material such as a soft flexible polymer (col. 3, lines             
              36-38) and includes a narrow slit 72 for opening and closing the valve in response to                     
              pressure differentials created during operation of the vehicle (col. 3, lines 39-42).  The                
              valve operates in the manner set forth at col. 4, lines 17-44, to vent the wheel hub cavity               
              42 to the interior of the axle and prevent the build-up of pressure in cavity 42 during use.              
              It is conceded by the examiner that Ehrlich does not respond to the “magnetic portion”                    
              limitation of claim 1.                                                                                    
                     Frehse is directed to a vented plug 12 for a wheel bearing hub assembly, wherein                   
              the plug includes a magnetic portion 11 that serves to collect metallic particles from the                
              bearing lubricating fluid.  Based on the teachings of the applied references, the examiner                
              considered that it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of             
              the invention “to provide the axle plug of Ehrlich with a magnetic portion to help remove                 
              metallic debris which may travel between the interior of the axle and the area inside the                 
              hub cap” (final rejection, page 3).  In an apparent modification of the examiner’s position in            
              response to arguments made by appellant in the main brief, the examiner now considers                     
              that it would have been obvious “to provide [the] axle vent assembly of Ehrlich with a                    
              magnetic portion” to help remove any ferrous metallic debris (answer, page 5).                            








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007