Ex Parte TIPPMANN - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2003-0127                                                        
          Application No. 09/157,388                                                  


               As evidence of obviousness, the examiner has applied the               
          documents listed below:                                                     


          Bucci               2,668,117           Feb.  2, 1954                       
          McDonald et al      5,256,432           Oct. 26, 1993                       
          (McDonald)                                                                  


               The following rejection is the sole rejection before us for            
          review.                                                                     


               Claims 1 through 18 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)            
          as being unpatentable over Bucci in view of McDonald.                       


               The full text of the examiner’s rejection and response to              
          the argument presented by appellant appears in the answer (Paper            
          No. 18), while the complete statement of appellant’s argument can           
          be found in the main and reply briefs (Paper Nos. 17 and 20).               


                                       OPINION                                        
               In reaching our conclusion on the obviousness issue raised             
          in this appeal, this panel of the board has carefully considered            




                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007