Appeal No. 2003-0177 Page 8 Application No. 09/231,642 of claim 1 or whether the bispecific antibody of claim 4 is a further limitation on the antibody required by claim 1. If the latter is intended by appellants, claim 4 should be redrafted using language such as "wherein the antibody is a bispecific antibody . . .." See, e.g., claim 5 on appeal. The decision of the examiner is reversed. REVERSED ) William F. Smith ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT Toni R. Scheiner ) )) APPEALS AND Administrative Patent Judge ) ) INTERFERENCES Hubert C. Lorin ) Administrative Patent Judge )Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007