The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DAVID K. PLATNER et al.
____________
Appeal No. 2003-0203
Application No. 09/419,136
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before FRANKFORT, STAAB, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection (Paper No. 7,
mailed May 21, 2001) of claims 1 to 9, which are all of the claims pending in this
application.1
We REVERSE.
1 Claims 1 to 3, 7 and 9 were amended subsequent to the final rejection. In claim 9, we suggest
that "wheel" be changed to --wheel axle-- for proper antecedent basis.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007