Ex Parte PLATNER et al - Page 1




                           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written          
                                  for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                   

                                                                                       Paper No. 19            

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                              
                                                ____________                                                   

                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                
                                           AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                                 ____________                                                  
                                       Ex parte DAVID K. PLATNER et al.                                        
                                                 ____________                                                  
                                             Appeal No. 2003-0203                                              
                                           Application No. 09/419,136                                          
                                                 ____________                                                  
                                                   ON BRIEF                                                    
                                                 ____________                                                  
             Before FRANKFORT, STAAB, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                  
             NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                



                                             DECISION ON APPEAL                                                
                   This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection (Paper No. 7,              
             mailed May 21, 2001) of claims 1 to 9, which are all of the claims pending in this                
             application.1                                                                                     


                   We REVERSE.                                                                                 


                   1 Claims 1 to 3, 7 and 9 were amended subsequent to the final rejection.  In claim 9, we suggest
             that "wheel" be changed to --wheel axle-- for proper antecedent basis.                            





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007