Ex Parte EUBANK et al - Page 2




            Appeal No. 2003-0210                                                                       
            Application 03/237,574                                                                     


                                           THE INVENTION                                               
                  The appellants claim a uranium article having a specified                            
            protective alloy coating.  Claim 1 is illustrative:                                        
                  1.    A metallic uranium article having a protective coating                         
            of a copper-tin alloy containing from 45 to 50% by weight of                               
            copper and from 55 to 50% by weight of tin, said alloy being                               
            firmly bonded to the metallic uranium.                                                     

                                           THE REFERENCES                                              
            Corson                          2,059,557          Nov.  3, 1936                           
            Eubank                          2,847,321          Aug. 12, 1958                           
            (filed Mar. 16, 1945)                                                                      
            Boller et al. (Boller)          2,848,351          Aug. 19, 1958                           
            (filed Sep. 28, 1945)                                                                      
            Robinson                        2,849,337          Aug. 26, 1958                           
            (filed Nov. 28, 1945)                                                                      
            Gray                            2,928,168          Mar. 15, 1960                           
            (filed Jan. 24, 1945)                                                                      
            Creutz                          3,037,924          Jun.  5, 1962                           
            (filed Jul. 30, 1945)                                                                      
                                           THE REJECTIONS                                              
                  The claims stand rejected as follows: claims 1, 7 and 15                             
            under 35 U.S.C. § 102(a) as being clearly anticipated by                                   
            Robinson; claims 1 and 7 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(a) as being                                 
            clearly anticipated by Boller; claims 1, 7 and 8 under 35 U.S.C.                           
            § 102(a) as being clearly anticipated by Eubank; claims 1-3, 10,                           
            11 and 13-15 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being obvious over Gray or                           




                                                  2                                                    





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007