Ex Parte MARKETING DISPLAYS, INC. - Page 1




          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was              
          not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the             
          Board.                                                                      
                                                            Paper No. 25              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
          Ex parte PETER J. JANSSEN, GEORGE A. MELNIK, SERGEI Y. YAKOVENKO,           
                    VICTOR A. KONOVALOV, and ANATOLI A. MURAVSKI                      
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 2003-0269                                  
                             Application No. 09/313,547                               
                                     __________                                       
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     __________                                       

          Before GARRIS, LIEBERMAN, and MOORE, Administrative Patent                  
          Judges.                                                                     
          GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on an appeal from the final rejection of            
          claims 14-25 which are all of the claims remaining in the                   
          application.                                                                
               The subject matter on appeal relates to an electro-optic               
          image display device.  With reference to the appellants’ drawing,           

                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007