Appeal No. 2003-0338 Page 6
Application No. 08/486,451
This rejection suffers from the same deficiencies as the rejection over the
combination of Prestrelski and Manning. With respect to claim 21, Igari I and
Igari II also teach a broad genus of protein compositions, with nothing directing
the ordinary artisan to the combination of thrombopoeitin with histidine. With
respect to claim 24, again, the rejection does not even discuss the limitations of
that claim. Thus, this rejection is reversed for the same reasons set forth above
with respect to the combination of Prestrelski and Manning.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007