Appeal No. 2003-0528 Page 2 Application No. 09/314,841 The references relied upon by the examiner are: Schwinn et al. (Schwinn) 4,297,344 Oct. 27, 1981 Butler et al. (Butler) 5,358,853 Oct. 25, 1994 Prestrelski et al. (Prestrelski) 5,580,856 Dec. 3, 1996 Hawkins et al. (Hawkins) 5,625,036 Apr. 29, 1997 Hora et al. (Hora) 5,730,969 Mar. 24, 1998 Brown 5,314,695 May 24, 1994 Brucato, et al. (Brucato) WO 98/48283 Oct. 29, 1998 Mimms et al. (Mimms), “Phospholipid Vesicle Formation and Transmembrane Protein Incorporation Using Octyl Glucoside,” Biochemistry, Vol. 20, pp. 833-840 (1981) GROUNDS OF REJECTION Claims 1, 2, 5, 7-11, 16-19, 21, 39, 43-45, 48-51, 53 and 54 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Brucato in view of Butler and Schwinn. Claims 22, 29, 31, 32, 34, 35, 37 and 38 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Brown in view of Brucato, Butler and Schwinn. Claims 12, 13, 41 and 42 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Brucato in view of Butler, Schwinn and Hawkins. Claims 24 and 25 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Brown in view of Brucato, Butler, Schwinn and Hawkins. Claims 4, 20, 26, 33, 36 and 52 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Brucato in view of Butler, Schwinn and Prestrelski with or without Brown. Claims 14, 15, 27, 28, 46 and 47 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Brucato in view of Butler, Schwinn and Hora with or without Brown.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007