Ex Parte LEMELSON - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2003-0545                                       Page 2           
          Application No. 08/436,096                                                  

          derived from a reading of exemplary claim 11, which is reproduced           
          as follows:                                                                 
               1.  A superconducting electrical cable comprising:                     
               a.   an elongated, flexible, solid light-conducting                    
          substrate formed of at least one strand of a uniform material               
          having a substantially constant cross section along its length;             
               b.   an outer stratum of said substrate being formed of                
          electrically insulating material;                                           
               c.   a first layer of superconducting material completely              
          surrounding said substrate immediately outside said outer stratum           
          and integrally secured to said substrate;                                   
               d.   a second layer of insulating material immediately                 
          outside, completely surrounding, and secured to said first layer;           
          and                                                                         
               e.   said substrate supporting said superconducting material           
          and providing major tensile strength for said superconducting               
          electrical cable.                                                           
               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
               Middleton et al. (Middleton) 1,698,704       Jan.  8, 1929             
               Snowden et al. (Snowden)      3,612,742      Oct. 12, 1971             
               Sakurai                  JP 56-4101          Jan. 17, 1981             
          (Japanese Published Patent Application)                                     



               1 As noted by the examiner (answer, page 3) the appendix to the brief  
          does not include a correct copy of the claims.  We observe that the claims, as
          listed in the appendix, do not include all of the amendments to the claims  
          made by appellant in "Amendment F" (Paper No. 25, filed September 14, 1998).
          We rely upon the correct copy of the appealed claims appended to the        
          examiner's answer.                                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007