Appeal No. 2003-0545 Page 3
Application No. 08/436,096
Jin et al. “High Tc superconductors-composite wire
fabrication” Appl. Phys. Lett. vol. 51, No. 3 (July 20, 1987) pp.
203-204.
Claims 1, 4-8, and 15-20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) as being unpatentable over Snowden in view of Sakurai.
Claims 10, 13, and 14 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) as unpatentable over Snowden in view of Sakurai and
further in view of Middleton.
Claim 11 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
unpatentable over Snowden in view of Sakurai and further in view
of Jin.
Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced by
the examiner and appellant regarding the above-noted rejections,
we make reference to the examiner's answer (Paper No. 31, mailed
August 29, 2000) for the examiner's complete reasoning in support
of the rejections, and to appellant's brief (Paper No. 30, filed
May 16, 2000) and reply brief (Paper No. 32, filed November 2,
2000) for appellant's arguments thereagainst. Only those
arguments actually made by appellant have been considered in this
decision. Arguments which appellant could have made but chose
not to make in the brief have not been considered. See 37 CFR
1.192(a).
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007