Appeal No. 2003-0587 Application No. 09/533,514 Further details relating to these aspects of appellants’ invention and to lift table drive motor control for minimizing the shock load associated with containers impacting the cases can be found on pages 12 through 15 of the specification. Independent claims 23, 37, 41, 45 and 46 are representative of the subject matter on appeal and a copy of those claims can be found in Appendix A of appellants’ brief. The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are: Wayne 3,529,732 Sep. 22, 1970 Westerling 3,765,546 Oct. 16, 1973 Golantsev et al. (Golantsev) 3,837,140 Sep. 24, 1974 Raudat 4,570,413 Feb. 18, 1986 Hjalmer et al. (Hjalmer) 4,686,918 Aug. 18, 1987 Groebli et al. (Groebli) 4,861,529 Aug. 29, 1989 Leibach et al. (Leibach) 5,529,295 Jun. 25, 1996 Claims 23, 24, 26, 29, 30 and 41 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Westerling. Claims 23, 37, 38, 45 and 46 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Raudat. 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007