Appeal No. 2003-0587 Application No. 09/533,514 Claims 23 and 37 also stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Wayne. Claim 23 is further rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Golantsev. Claim 25 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Westerling in view of Leibach. Claim 39 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Raudat in view of Leibach. Claims 27, 28 and 40 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Westerling. Claims 27, 28 and 40 also stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Westerling in view of Hjalmer. Claim 31 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Westerling in view of Groebli. Rather than attempt to reiterate the examiner's full commentary with regard to the above-noted rejections and the 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007