The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 20 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte DOUGLAS G. NELSON ____________ Appeal No. 2003-0622 Application No. 09/974,545 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before ABRAMS, FRANKFORT, and STAAB, Administrative Patent Judges. ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1-55. Claims 8-11, 14, 23-26, 29, 45-48 and 51 have been indicated as containing allowable subject matter. We therefore need consider only the rejections of claims 1-7, 12, 13, 15-22, 27, 28, 30-44, 49, 50 and 52-55. We REVERSE AND REMAND THE APPLICATION TO THE EXAMINER.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007