Ex Parte Kaewell et al - Page 3




            Appeal No. 2003-0660                                                                       
            Application No. 09/791,259                                                                 



                  a circuit for adjusting the TX and RX timing of said                                 
            primary/secondary station in accordance with said synchronization                          
            information, whereby the timing of said primary/secondary station                          
            is synchronized to said first communication station; and                                   
                  a transmitter for transmitting synchronization information                           
            to said second communication station, wherein said second                                  
            communication station includes a circuit for adjusting the TX and                          
            RX timing of said second communication station in accordance with                          
            said synchronization information, whereby the timing of said                               
            second communication station is synchronized to said                                       
            primary/secondary communication station.                                                   
                  The following reference is relied on by the Examiner:                                
                  Schlosser et al. (Schlosser)   3,897,581              Apr. 22, 1975                  
                  Claims 1-5 and 7-13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)                          
            as being anticipated by Schlosser.                                                         
                  Claims 6 and 14 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as                           
            being unpatentable over Schlosser.                                                         
                  Rather than reiterate the viewpoints of the Examiner and                             
            Appellants regarding the above-noted rejections, we make                                   
            reference to the answer (Paper No. 13, mailed October 8, 2002)                             
            for the Examiner’s reasoning, and to the brief (Paper No. 12,                              
            filed May 31, 2002) for Appellants’ arguments thereagainst.                                
                                               OPINION                                                 
                  In rejecting claims 1-5 and 7-13 under 35 U.S.C. § 102, the                          
            Examiner equates the repeater in spacecraft 100 of Schlosser                               
            with the claimed primary/secondary station (answer, page 3).  The                          

                                                  3                                                    





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007