Appeal No. 2003-0709 Application No. 09/332,240 Lacking such a suggestion in the prior art or such scientific reasoning by the examiner, we must conclude that the examiner's conclusion of obviousness is without the requisite factual support. In conclusion, based on the foregoing, we are constrained to reverse the examiner's rejection. REVERSED EDWARD C. KIMLIN ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) PAUL LIEBERMAN ) BOARD OF PATENT Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) BEVERLY PAWLIKOWSI ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ECK:clm -5-Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007