The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 20 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte JAMES L. VINEYARDS, JR. and JAMES A. MCKEETH ____________ Appeal No. 2003-0766 Application No. 09/266,3251 ____________ HEARD: OCTOBER 9, 2003 ____________ Before HAIRSTON, DIXON and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges. SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the Examiner’s final rejection of claims 1, 3-9 and 11-20. The Examiner has objected to claims 2 and 10 and has indicated their allowability if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. We reverse. 1 Application for patent filed March 11, 1999.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007