Appeal No. 2003-0777 Application No. 09/554,969 has been withdrawn by the examiner. Claims 22 and 24 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected claim (see page 3 of answer). A copy of illustrative claim 1 is appended to this decision. The examiner relies upon the following reference as evidence of obviousness: Trinh et al. (WO ‘169) WO 97/03169 Jan. 30, 1997 Appellants’ claimed invention is directed to a clear, or translucent, liquid fabric softener composition comprising, inter alia, a principal solvent having a ClogP within the claimed range, and an electrolyte in an amount of from about 0.5% to about 10% by weight. According to appellants, “[t]he utilization of relatively high levels of electrolyte allows the utilization of a relatively broad range of principal solvents to provide a clear or translucent composition” (page 2 of brief, third paragraph). Appealed claims 1, 12-21, 23 and 25-39 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over WO ‘169. Appellants submit at page 2 of the brief that “[c]laims 1 and 15-39 stand or fall together.” Accordingly, with the exception of claims 12, 13 and 14, for which appellants provide 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007