The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and
is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 31
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DANIEL BAR-SHALOM
____________
Appeal No. 2003-0816
Application No. 09/693,254
____________
HEARD: August 21, 2003
____________
Before KIMLIN, JEFFREY T. SMITH and POTEATE, Administrative Patent
Judges.
JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Applicant appeals the decision of the Primary Examiner finally rejecting
claims 1, 2, 4 to 7, 9 to 14, 16 to 27 and 35 to 54.1,2 We have jurisdiction under 35
U.S.C. § 134.3
1 The claims on appeal have been amended in the after final response filed January 12,
1999, which has been entered by the Examiner. (Answer, p. 2).
2 According to Appellant, Brief page 3, the Examiner has indicated that claims 3, 8 and
34 contain allowable subject matter.
3 In rendering our decision we have considered Appellant’s position as presented in the
Brief, filed June 24, 1999 and the Reply Brief, filed December 6, 1999.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007