Ex Parte BAR-SHALOM - Page 8




                     Appeal No. 2003-0816                                                                                                 
                     Application No. 09/693,254                                                                                           


                     obvious to add an additional cellulose derivative to the coating composition of                                      
                     WO ‘066.4                                                                                                            
                                                             CONCLUSION                                                                   
                             The rejection of claims 1, 2, 4 to 7, 9 to 14, 16 to 27 and 35 to 54 as                                      
                     unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over the combination of Conte,                                      
                     WO ‘066 and Banker is reversed.                                                                                      
                                                              REVERSED                                                                    
                                                                                          )                                               
                                                                                          )                                               
                                         EDWARD C. KIMLIN                                 )                                               
                                         Administrative Patent Judge                      )                                               
                                                                                          )                                               
                                                                                          )                                               
                                                                                          ) BOARD OF PATENT                               
                                         JEFFREY T. SMITH                                 )        APPEALS                                
                                         Administrative Patent Judge                      )            AND                                
                                                                                          )  INTERFERENCES                                
                                                                                          )                                               
                                                                                          )                                               
                                         LINDA R. POTEATE                                 )                                               
                                         Administrative Patent Judge                      )                                               
                     JTS/kis                                                                                                              



                             4  We note that the claimed invention uses Markush language in describing the                                
                     components of the coating. Thus, all of the components b, c and d are not required to be present                     
                     in the coating ccomposition.                                                                                         
                                                                     8                                                                    




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007