Ex Parte HOLLIS et al - Page 1




                           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written               
                                  for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                        
                                                                                     Paper No. 39                   
                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                   
                                                   __________                                                       
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                     
                                           AND INTERFERENCES                                                        
                                                   __________                                                       
                             Ex parte GREGORY F. HOLLIS, and GEORGE E. MARK                                         
                                                   __________                                                       
                                              Appeal No. 2003-0847                                                  
                                            Application No. 08/744,685                                              
                                                   __________                                                       
                                             HEARD:  June 26, 2003                                                  
                                                   __________                                                       
                 Before SCHEINER, MILLS, and GREEN, Administrative Patent Judges.                                   
                 GREEN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                

                                             DECISION ON APPEAL                                                     
                       This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s                       
                 final rejection of claims 6, 15-17, 19, 21-27 and 29-35.  Claim 6 is representative                
                 of the subject matter on appeal, and reads as follows:                                             
                 6.    A homologous recombination insertional expression vector capable of                          
                 expressing a recombinant gene in a NS/O cell, said vector comprising said                          
                 recombinant gene and gamma 2A locus-specific DNA sequences capable of                              
                 homologous recombination targeting into the NS/O gamma 2A locus, wherein                           
                 said recombinant gene comprises a nucleic acid sequence encoding for a                             
                 recombinant protein and a promoter transcriptionally coupled to said nucleic acid                  
                 sequence, wherein said promoter is capable of providing for expression in said                     
                 NS/O cell and said recombinant gene is capable of expression in said NS/O cell.                    

                       The examiner relies upon the following references:                                           






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007