Appeal No. 2003-0847 Page 2 Application No. 08/744,685 Fell et al. (Fell A) 5,204,244 Apr. 20, 1993 Reff et al. (Reff) 5,998,144 Dec. 07, 1999 Fell et al. (Fell B) “Homologous Recombination in Hybridoma Cells: Heavy Chain Chimeric Antibody Produced by Gene Targeting,” Proc. Natl. Acad, Sci, USA Vol. 86, pp. 8507-8511 (1989) Delente, “Glycosylation Revisited,” Trends in Biotechnolgy, Vol. 3, No. 9 (1985) Yamawaki-Kataoka et al. (Yamawaki-Kataoka), “The Complete Nucleotide Sequence of Mouse Immunoglobulin γ2a Gene and Evolution of Heavy Chain Genes: Further Evidence for Intervening Sequence-Mediated Domain Transfer,” Nucleic Acids Research Vol. 9, pp. 1365-1381 (1981) Morrison “Transfer and Expression of Immunoglobulin Genes,” Ann. Rev. Immunol, Vol. 2 pp. 239-256, (1984) Paul, “Regulation of Immunoglobin Gene Expression,” Fundamental Immunology, 3rd ed., Raven Press, Ltd, pp. 351-370 (1993) Sambrook et al. (Sambrook), Molecular Cloning, A Laboratory Manual, 2nd Edition, pp. 16.8-16.15 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, (1989) Claims 19, 23 and 27 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, as containing subject matter that was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventors, at the time of filing, had possession of the claimed invention. Claims 6, 15-17, 19, 21-27 and 29-35 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, as the disclosure as filed fails to enable one skilled in the art to make and/or use the full scope of the claimed invention. Claims 6, 15-17, 19, 21-27 and 29-35 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter that appellant regards as the invention. Finally, claims 6, 15-17, 19, 22, 23, 27 and 30 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being renderedPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007