Appeal No. 2003-0869 Application No. 09/692,715 The appellants observe that the disclosure of oxidation bases in Audousset is broad. They admit that Audousset discloses pyrimidine derivatives and pyrazole derivatives are both oxidation bases, but assert that the disclosure of Audousset is to their usefulness in conjunction with a coupler of Audousset’s formula I and at least one additional heterocyclic coupler to form oxidation dyes. Audousset, it is urged, never teaches or suggests the couplers of the instant claims. (Appeal Brief, page 9, lines 1-10). We find this argument persuasive. While we agree with the examiner that Audousset discloses the functional equivalence of the oxidation bases of pyrimidine and pyrazole derivatives, we note that this disclosure is in the context of very specific coupler combinations. Audousset’s couplers are indole couplers having two rings (see column 2, lines 14-30) and used in conjunction with an additional heterocyclic coupler (column 2, line 35). The instantly claimed couplers are 2-substituted 5- aminoalkylphenol derivatives, which differ substantially in structure. The oxidation coloration reaction is between the oxidation dye and a coupler (Ogawa, column 1, lines 16-21). 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007