The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 32 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte THOMAS BOCK, PAUL SAEGMUELLER, PETER SIEGER and DIETRICH TUERCK, ____________ Appeal No. 2003-0913 Application No. 09/277,049 ON BRIEF ____________________________ Before LIEBERMAN, MILLS and GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judges. LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the decision of the examiner refusing to allow claims 4 through 19 and claims 1 through 3 and 21 through 25 as amended subsequent to the final rejection, which are all the claims pending in this application. THE INVENTION The invention is directed to a solid pharmaceutical composition comprising a salt ofPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007