Appeal No. 2003-0913 9
Application No. 09/277,049
DECISION
The rejection of claims 1, 4 and 14 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, as
being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter
which appellants’ regard as the invention is reversed.
The rejection of claims 6 through 19 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, as
containing subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to
enable one skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected
to make/or use the invention is reversed.
The rejection of claims1 through 5 and 21 through 25 under 35 U.S.C. §102(b) as
being anticipated by Luger or Trummlitz is affirmed.
The rejection of claims 1through 5 under 35 U.S.C. §103(a) as being unpatentable
over Trummlitz in view of Luger is affirmed.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007