The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 21 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte JÜRG ZIMMERMANN, BERTRAND SUTTER, and HANS M. BÜRGER __________ Appeal No. 2003-0919 Application No. 09/463,097 __________ ON BRIEF __________ WINTERS, SCHEINER, and MILLS, Administrative Patent Judges. WINTERS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This appeal was taken from the examiner's decision rejecting claims 1 through 8, 10, and 13 through 16. Claim 12, which is the only other claim remaining in the application, stands allowed. (Examiner's Answer, Paper No. 17, section (3)). The Invention The invention relates to a particular, non-hygroscopic crystalline form of the methanesulfonic acid addition salt of 4-(4-methylpiperazin-1-ylmethyl)-N-[4-methyl-3-(4- pyridin-3-yl)pyrimidin-2-ylamino)phenyl]-benzamide, said to have advantageous flow properties. In their specification and claims, applicants describe this non-hygroscopicPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007