Ex Parte McElroy et al - Page 5




         Appeal No. 2003-0936                                                       
         Application No. 09/532,806                                                 


              51.  The transgenic plant of claim 20, further defined                
                   as a fertile R0 transgenic plant.                                
              52.  A seed of the fertile R0 transgenic plant of claim 51,           
                   wherein said seed comprises said selected DNA.                   
              85.  A transgenic plant3 stably transformed with                      
                   a selected DNA comprising a maize GRP promoter                   
                   comprising at least 95 contiguous bases of                       
                   SEQ ID NO:1.                                                     
              96.  The transgenic plant cell of claim 85, wherein said              
                   selected DNA further comprises a selected coding                 
                   region operably linked to said maize GRP promoter.               
              114. A method of preparing a transgenic plant comprising              
                   the steps of:                                                    
                   (i)  obtaining a construct comprising a maize GRP                
                        promoter comprising at least 95 contiguous bases            
                        of SEQ ID NO:1;                                             
                   (ii)  transforming a recipient plant cell with said              
                        construct; and                                              
                   (iii) regenerating said recipient plant cell to                  
                        obtain a transgenic plant transformed with said             
                        construct.                                                  
              According to the examiner, (1) appellants’ claims are drawn           
         to “subject matter which was not described in the specification in         
         such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant          
         art that the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed,           
         had possession of the claimed invention” (EA 3); and                       


              3    Note that claims dependent upon Claim 85 refer to                
         “[t]he transgenic plant cell of claim 85" (emphasis added).                
                                         5                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007