Ex Parte SANSONE et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2003-0961                                                        
          Application No. 09/298,782                                                  
               1.  A system for correcting the rating and payment of mail             
          pieces, said system comprises:                                              
               a plurality of mailer’s digital units that stores unique               
          information that includes mail piece characteristics contained in           
          a postal indicia affixed to each mail piece, wherein the unique             
          information specifically identifies each mail piece and includes            
          an amount of postage paid for each piece of mail;                           
               a plurality of postal units that captures and stores the               
          unique information contained in the postal indicia; and                     
               a data center that receives information stored by the                  
          mailer’s units and the unique information captured by the postal            
          units to determine if a proper amount of postage has been paid              
          for servicing and handling of the mail.                                     
                                   THE PRIOR ART                                      
               The references relied on by the examiner to support the                
          final rejection are:                                                        
          Breault et al. (Breault)      4,941,091           Jul. 10, 1990             
          Berson et al. (Berson)        5,819,239           Oct.  6, 1998             
                                   THE REJECTIONS                                     
               Claims 1 through 13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e)            
          as being anticipated by Berson.                                             
               Claims 14 and 16 through 18 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.             
          § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Berson.                                 
               Claim 15 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being             
          unpatentable over Berson in view of Breault.                                


                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007