Ex Parte Clendenin - Page 1




            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
                   for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.         

                                                                 Paper No. 26         

                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                     ____________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                     ____________                                     
                               Ex parte HARRY CLENDENIN                               
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 2003-0966                                 
                              Application No. 09/496,486                              
                                     ____________                                     
                                  HEARD: Nov. 5, 2003                                 
                                     ____________                                     
          Before FRANKFORT, STAAB, and MCQUADE, Administrative Patent Judges.         
          STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         

                                   Decision on Appeal                                 

               Harry Clendenin (appellant) originally took this appeal from           
          the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-27, all the claims               
          currently pending in the application.  In a paper submitted October         
          3, 2003 (Paper No. 25), appellant “requests that claims 21-27 be            
          withdrawn from this appeal.”  Accordingly, the appeal as to claims          
          21-27 is dismissed, leaving only the examiner’s final rejection of          
          claims 1-20 for our review.                                                 









Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007