Appeal No. 2003-0966
Application No. 09/496,486
Accordingly, we shall not sustain the standing 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) rejection of claim 1, or of claims 2-20 that depend
therefrom, as being unpatentable over Elson in view of “Prior Art”
Figure 1.
The decision of the examiner is reversed.
REVERSED
CHARLES E. FRANKFORT )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
LAWRENCE J. STAAB ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
JOHN P. MCQUADE )
Administrative Patent Judge )
LJS/lp
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007