Ex Parte STACHE et al - Page 5


                Appeal No. 2003-1034                                                  Page 5                 
                Application No. 08/897,455                                                                   

                rejection.  The rejection is not reversed, however, because, as we note above,               
                the teachings of that reference appear to be relevant to the patentability of the            
                claimed methods.                                                                             
                      We are also vacating the rejections over Page, Bowers and Oughton.                     
                With respect to the rejection of claims 11-17 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious            
                over Page, the examiner states:                                                              
                            Page [ ] generically teach[es] 17,21-dicarboxylic acid esters                    
                      of 4-pregnen-3,20-dione having an oxo, halogen or a hydroxyl                           
                      group in the 11-position and substituents in the 6, 9 and 16                           
                      positions which include those recited by the claimed invention.  The                   
                      reference teaches the compounds may also contain a double bond                         
                      in the 1-position and the use of the compounds in the treatment of                     
                      corticosteroid-responsive dermatosis.                                                  
                            The instant claims differ from the reference by reciting                         
                      specific species not exemplified by the reference, i.e., compounds                     
                      wherein R(1) is phenyl which may be substituted as indicated by                        
                      the claimed invention.  However, the generic disclosure of Page                        
                      suggests most of the substituents of the claimed “Markush”                             
                      structure including the claimed aralkyl ester group attached to the                    
                      21-position.  Page discloses compounds of formula (I) wherein R5 is                    
                      OC(O)-R’’, wherein R’’ is an alkyl group of 1 to 16 carbon atoms, a                    
                      phenyl group or an aralkyl group of 7 to 8 carbon atoms (i.e., -                       
                      (CH2)1-2-phenyl).  Applicant’s claimed compound defining R(1) as a                     
                      phenyl group is thus within the scope of the disclosure of Page [ ].                   
                      The motivation to make the claimed compounds is based on the                           
                      desire to make additional compounds useful in the treatment of                         
                      corticosteroid-responsive dermatosis as taught by the prior art.                       
                Examiner’s Answer, pages 3-4 (citations omitted).                                            
                      The rejection over Page suffers from the same deficiencies as the                      
                rejection over Djerassi.  Again, a broad disclosure of a genus does not render               
                any species that falls within it obvious, rather, there need be some teaching or             
                suggestion to lead the ordinary artisan to select the claimed compound.  The                 
                examiner asserts in the response to arguments that sixteen of the thirty-three               





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007