Appeal No. 2003-1034 Page 5 Application No. 08/897,455 rejection. The rejection is not reversed, however, because, as we note above, the teachings of that reference appear to be relevant to the patentability of the claimed methods. We are also vacating the rejections over Page, Bowers and Oughton. With respect to the rejection of claims 11-17 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over Page, the examiner states: Page [ ] generically teach[es] 17,21-dicarboxylic acid esters of 4-pregnen-3,20-dione having an oxo, halogen or a hydroxyl group in the 11-position and substituents in the 6, 9 and 16 positions which include those recited by the claimed invention. The reference teaches the compounds may also contain a double bond in the 1-position and the use of the compounds in the treatment of corticosteroid-responsive dermatosis. The instant claims differ from the reference by reciting specific species not exemplified by the reference, i.e., compounds wherein R(1) is phenyl which may be substituted as indicated by the claimed invention. However, the generic disclosure of Page suggests most of the substituents of the claimed “Markush” structure including the claimed aralkyl ester group attached to the 21-position. Page discloses compounds of formula (I) wherein R5 is OC(O)-R’’, wherein R’’ is an alkyl group of 1 to 16 carbon atoms, a phenyl group or an aralkyl group of 7 to 8 carbon atoms (i.e., - (CH2)1-2-phenyl). Applicant’s claimed compound defining R(1) as a phenyl group is thus within the scope of the disclosure of Page [ ]. The motivation to make the claimed compounds is based on the desire to make additional compounds useful in the treatment of corticosteroid-responsive dermatosis as taught by the prior art. Examiner’s Answer, pages 3-4 (citations omitted). The rejection over Page suffers from the same deficiencies as the rejection over Djerassi. Again, a broad disclosure of a genus does not render any species that falls within it obvious, rather, there need be some teaching or suggestion to lead the ordinary artisan to select the claimed compound. The examiner asserts in the response to arguments that sixteen of the thirty-threePage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007