Ex Parte STOUT - Page 7



          Appeal No. 2003-1046                                                        
          Application 09/100,934                                                      

          are not ‘evidence.’” In re Dembiczak, 175 F.3d 994, 999, 50                 
          USPQ2d 1614, 1617.  “Mere denials and conclusory statements,                
          however, are not sufficient to establish a genuine issue of                 
          material fact.”  Dembiczak, 175 F.3d at 999, 50 USPQ2d at 1617,             
          citing McElmurry v. Arkansas Power & Light Co., 995 F.2d 1576,              
          1578, 27 USPQ2d 1129, 1131 (Fed. Cir. 1993).                                
               We fail to find that the Examiner has failed to provide                
          findings that support the Examiner’s conclusion of obviousness.             
          The Examiner is charged with the burden of providing objective              
          evidence for the record.  Broad conclusory statements regarding             
          that Appellant’s claimed limitation are obvious without proper              
          findings in the prior art to show that these limitations are                
          known, fail to meet this burden.                                            











                                          7                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007