The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 16 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte AKIHIRO MIYACHI, MASASHI SETO, KAZUHIRO SHIMADA, and HIDEO TAMURA _____________ Appeal No. 2003-1205 Application No. 09/568,406 ______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before PAK, OWENS, and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges. PAK, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 through 4, 7 and 8, which are all of the claims under rejection in the present application. The examiner has withdrawn the rejection of claims 5, 6 and 9 through 13, subsequent to the final Office action dated June 14, 2002. See the Answer, page 3.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007