Ex Parte Miyachi et al - Page 1




            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not        
            written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.        

                                                            Paper No. 16              


                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    _____________                                     
                             Ex parte AKIHIRO MIYACHI,                                
                                   MASASHI SETO,                                      
                                 KAZUHIRO SHIMADA,                                    
                                        and                                           
                                    HIDEO TAMURA                                      
                                   _____________                                      
                                Appeal No. 2003-1205                                  
                             Application No. 09/568,406                               
                                   ______________                                     
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                   _______________                                    

          Before PAK, OWENS, and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.                 
          PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.                                           

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from             
          the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 through 4, 7 and 8,              
          which are all of the claims under rejection in the present                  
          application.  The examiner has withdrawn the rejection of claims            
          5, 6 and 9 through 13, subsequent to the final Office action                
          dated June 14, 2002.  See the Answer, page 3.                               






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007