Ex Parte Miyachi et al - Page 3




          Appeal No. 2003-1205                                                        
          Application No. 09/568,406                                                  


                         1.  A fiber optic connector for mating with a                
               complementary connecting device along a mating optical axis,           
               comprising:                                                            
                    an outer housing having a forward mating end, a                   
               rear end and a resilient latch portion for latching                    
               engagement with the complementary connecting device, the               
               outer housing including wall means at said rear end                    
               substantially surrounding said axis to define a cavity                 
               opening rearwardly of the housing;                                     
                         an inner housing fitted into the rearwardly                  
               opening cavity in the outer housing whereby said wall means            
               constrains the inner housing in “X” and “Y” directions                 
               generally perpendicular to said axis, the inner housing                
               including an optical element receiving cavity communicating            
               with the optical axis; and                                             
                         complementary interengaging retaining means                  
               between the inner and outer housings to hold the inner                 
               housing in the rearwardly opening cavity of the outer                  
               housing against movement in a “Z” direction generally                  
               parallel to said axis.                                                 
                                     PRIOR ART                                        
               The examiner relies on the following sole prior art                    
          reference:                                                                  
          Komatsu                       4,778,240           Oct. 18, 1988             
                                    THE REJECTION                                     
               Claims 1 through 4, 7 and 8 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.             
          § 102(b) as anticipated by the disclosure of Komatsu.                       
                                       OPINION                                        
               We have carefully reviewed the claims, specification and               
          applied prior art, including all of the arguments advanced by               
                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007