Ex Parte YANG - Page 3




            Appeal No. 2003-1233                                                                              
            Application No. 09/420,817                                                                        


            need for packages which comprise multiple chips that have been connected together prior           
            to connection to the outside world.  Claim 24, which is representative of the claimed             
            invention, appears below:                                                                         
                   24.  A multi-chip module comprising:                                                       
                   a central support layer having a central aperture, a top side and a bottom                 
                   side, a bonding pad on each of said sides and conductive interconnections                  
                   extending through said layer;                                                              
                   a first chip wire bonded to the top side of said layer through said aperture               
                   and secured to the bottom side of said layer;                                              
                   a second chip secured to the top side of said layer, said second ship secured              
                   by bumps to said layer; and                                                                
                   said layer extending outwardly beyond said first and second chips, said                    
                   layer including a solder ball pad on an extension extending outwardly                      
                   beyond said first and second chips for electrically connecting said chips to               
                   external devices.                                                                          
                   Appellant has indicated that “all of the pending claims may be grouped with                
            claim 24.” (Brief, p. 5).  We interpret Appellant’s statement as indicating that all of the       
            claims stand or fall together.  Accordingly, all the claims will stand or fall together, and      
            we select claim 24 as representative of the rejected claims.  Note In re King, 801 F.2d           
            1324, 1325, 231 USPQ 136, 137 (Fed. Cir. 1986); In re Sernaker, 702 F.2d 989, 991,                
            217 USPQ 1, 3 (Fed. Cir. 1983).  37 CFR § 1.192 (c)(7) and (8) (2001).                            


                                                      3                                                       





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007