Ex Parte Yatka et al - Page 1




           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written 
                 for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.           

                                                              Paper No. 15            
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    ____________                                      
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    ____________                                      
                              Ex parte ROBERT J. YATKA,                               
                       DAVID G. BARKALOW and LINDELL C. RICHEY                        
                                    ____________                                      
                                Appeal No. 2003-1266                                  
                             Application No. 09/735,054                               
                                    ____________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                    ____________                                      
          Before GARRIS, OWENS, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.              
          OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         
                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This appeal is from the final rejection of claims 1-5, 8-10,           
          13-17 and 20, which are all of the claims remaining in the                  
          application.                                                                
                                    THE INVENTION                                     
               The appellants claim a chewing gum product and a method for            
          making it.  Claims 1, 13 and 15 are illustrative:                           
               1.  A chewing gum product comprising                                   
                    a center including a water-soluble portion and a water-           
          insoluble portion;                                                          









Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007