The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and
is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 30
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ANTHONY J. TOPRAC
and MICHAEL L. MILLER
____________
Appeal No. 2003-1323
Application No. 09/421,803
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before OWENS, LIEBERMAN, and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.
JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Applicants appeal the decision of the Primary Examiner finally rejecting claims 26
to 45, all of the pending claims in the application.1 We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.
§ 134.
1 In rendering our decision we have considered Appellants’ position present in the Brief, filed
September 30, 2002 and the Reply Brief, filed February 13, 2003.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007