The opinion in support of the decision entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 33 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte LUEDER MOSLER and MARTIN PUSCH ____________ Appeal No. 2003-1359 Application No. 09/285,260 ____________ HEARD: OCTOBER 8, 2003 ____________ Before ABRAMS, STAAB, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges. STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1, 3 and 21-29. Claims 4-20, the only other claims currently pending in the application, have been withdrawn from consideration under 37 CFR § 1.142(b) as not reading on the elected species.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007