Ex Parte MOSLER et al - Page 5



              Appeal No. 2003-1359                                                                      5              
              Application No. 09/285,260                                                                               


              specification.  In re Morris, 127 F.3d 1048, 1054, 44 USPQ2d 1023, 1027 (Fed. Cir. 1997).                
              See also, In re Sneed, 710 F.2d 1544, 1548, 218 USPQ 385, 388 (Fed. Cir. 1983).                          
                    Independent claim 1 is directed to an artificial foot comprising, inter alia, a first spring       
              element comprising at least one forefoot leaf spring element extending into the forefoot                 
              region of the artificial foot, a second spring element located at least in part in the heel              
              region of the artificial foot, and                                                                       
                           an adapting device actuated in response to flexing of said second                           
                    spring element and operatively connected to the second spring element for                          
                    changing the spring rigidity of the artificial foot by changing the spring rigidity                
                    of the forefoot leaf spring element responsive to a load placed on the artificial                  
                    foot which causes flexing of the second spring element, wherein the adapting                       
                    device is operatively connected to the forefoot leaf spring element for directly                   
                    changing its bending resistance and wherein deflection of the second spring                        
                    element in the heel due of flexing thereof comprises an input variable for                         
                    actuating the adapting device.  [Emphasis added.]                                                  

                    Independent claim 24 is similar to claim 1 in that it also is directed to an artificial foot       
              comprising a first spring element comprising at least one forefoot leaf spring element, and              
              a second spring element located at least in part in the heel region of the artificial foot.              
              However, claim 24 claims the adapting device in means-plus-function format.  More                        
              particularly, claim 24 calls for                                                                         
                           means, operatively connected to the second spring element, for                              
                    changing the spring rigidity of the artificial foot by directly changing the                       
                    bending resistance of the forefoot spring element responsive to flexing of said                    
                    second spring element due to a load placed on the artificial foot, wherein                         
                    deflection of the second spring element in the heel due to flexing thereof                         
                    comprises an input variable for actuating the adapting device [sic, means for                      
                    changing]. [Emphasis added.]                                                                       








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007