Appeal No. 2003-1379 Application No. 09/769,334 energy absorption since it must be able to absorb energy produced by the weight of the aircraft during the landing (physical compression caused by the landing). This is especially true since the appellant acknowledges at page 1 of the specification that such landing gear structure is well known. In view of the foregoing, we affirm the examiner’s decision rejecting the claims on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 103. However, since our rationale for affirming this rejection is materially different from that supplied by the examiner, we denominate our affirmance as including a new ground of rejection pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.196(b)(2002). This decision contains a new ground of rejection pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.196(b)(amended effective Dec. 1, 1997, by final rule notice, 62 Fed. Reg. 53,131, 53,197 (Oct. 10, 1997), 1203 Off. Gaz. Pat. & Trademark Office 63, 122 (Oct. 21, 1997)). 37 CFR § 1.196(b) provides that, “A new ground of rejection shall not be considered final for purposes of judicial review.” 37 CFR § 1.196(b) also provides that the appellants, WITHIN TWO MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF THE DECISION, must exercise one of the following two options with respect to the new ground of 8Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007