The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 34 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte SAMUEL F. LIPRIE ____________ Appeal No. 2003-1401 Application No. 08/814,401 ____________ HEARD: OCTOBER 22, 2003 ____________ Before COHEN, McQUADE, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges. COHEN, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This appeal is taken from the final rejection (Paper No. 20) of claims 1 through 9 and 21 through 30 (Notice of Appeal; Paper No. 23). However, while the cover sheet of the final rejection indicates that claim 9 is under rejection, no rejection of claim 9 is set forth in the final rejection. With no rejection of claim 9 having been made by the examiner, that claim appears to be allowable. Claim 27 is indicated in the final rejection as being allowed. Claims 23 and 30 also appear to be allowable in light of the withdrawal of a rejection thereof (footnote 1).Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007