The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 45
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte SIMON E. KADIJK,
ERIC N.J.O. QUINT,
and
HIDDO H. HANENBURG
__________
Appeal No. 2003-1474
Application No. 09/024,631
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before PAK, WARREN and MOORE, Administrative Patent Judges.
MOORE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final
rejection of claims 1, 4, 8, 9, and 12-16. Claims 2, 3, 10, and
11 have been canceled, while claims 5-7 have been withdrawn from
consideration. Thus, only claims 1, 4, 8, 9, and 12-16 are before
us on this appeal.
REPRESENTATIVE CLAIM
The appellants have indicated (Brief, page 6) that, for the
purposes of this appeal, the claims will stand or fall together.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007